<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bott&#039;s Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver</link>
	<description>Techno Ramblings and Other Binary Bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:56:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ReadyNAS Pro &amp; NVX &#8211; Boot/Diagnostics Menu by dbott</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=252&#038;cpage=1#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>dbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=252#comment-293</guid>
		<description>@ Tim: The test will keep running until you power off the system.  7 passes without errors means that the memory is good.  I haven&#039;t run the memory tests in quite a while, but I do recall that it can take over an hour per pass (depending on the amount of RAM).

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readynas.com/forum/faq.php#Is_there_a_way_I_can_verify_if_my_memory_is_good%3F&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FAQ on the ReadyNAS.com&lt;/a&gt; forums states:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Starting with RAIDiator 3.01, there is comprehensive memory test that you can run on the ReadyNAS. To invoke it, power-down the ReadyNAS and depress the front power button, until you see all disk LEDs blink together for the 5th time (ignore the quick flash at the beginning). Disks will blink for about a second at about the 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-sec mark. Release at that point. The first disk LED will come on to signify the first of an 8-stage memory test. The LED sequence for the 8 stages will be in binary format going from left to right. When all disk LEDs are lit, the memory is good. If the first and second LED blink, followed by the 3rd and 4th LEDs, in alternating pattern, the memory is bad.

&lt;strong&gt;Please keep in mind that the success rate for flagging an actual bad memory is about 85%, so we do recommend that you run this test twice.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tim: The test will keep running until you power off the system.  7 passes without errors means that the memory is good.  I haven&#8217;t run the memory tests in quite a while, but I do recall that it can take over an hour per pass (depending on the amount of RAM).</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.readynas.com/forum/faq.php#Is_there_a_way_I_can_verify_if_my_memory_is_good%3F" rel="nofollow">FAQ on the ReadyNAS.com</a> forums states:</p>
<blockquote><p>Starting with RAIDiator 3.01, there is comprehensive memory test that you can run on the ReadyNAS. To invoke it, power-down the ReadyNAS and depress the front power button, until you see all disk LEDs blink together for the 5th time (ignore the quick flash at the beginning). Disks will blink for about a second at about the 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-sec mark. Release at that point. The first disk LED will come on to signify the first of an 8-stage memory test. The LED sequence for the 8 stages will be in binary format going from left to right. When all disk LEDs are lit, the memory is good. If the first and second LED blink, followed by the 3rd and 4th LEDs, in alternating pattern, the memory is bad.</p>
<p><strong>Please keep in mind that the success rate for flagging an actual bad memory is about 85%, so we do recommend that you run this test twice.</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ReadyNAS Pro &amp; NVX &#8211; Boot/Diagnostics Menu by Tim</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=252&#038;cpage=1#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=252#comment-292</guid>
		<description>How long does the memory test take on average for the Pro. it&#039;s currently on pass 7 and has been running for 9 hrs. Also why the need to run it twice would would be missed in the first pass?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long does the memory test take on average for the Pro. it&#8217;s currently on pass 7 and has been running for 9 hrs. Also why the need to run it twice would would be missed in the first pass?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wireless Performance Issues with Vista/Windows7 and the ReadyNAS by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226&#038;cpage=1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Great, after weeks of headache this article solve the issue for Windows 7 and the ReadyNAS!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, after weeks of headache this article solve the issue for Windows 7 and the ReadyNAS!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wireless Performance Issues with Vista/Windows7 and the ReadyNAS by Ian Westwood</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226&#038;cpage=1#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Westwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226#comment-282</guid>
		<description>You sir are a complete genius!  Having been banging my head against the wall for the last week or so since trying to setup iTunes on my sons new laptop with Windows 7 64-bit and also transferring my other sons iTunes library to his Vista laptop.

Performance was PAINFULLY bad, and no matter what I tried, it didn&#039;t work. 

I used your MTU setting of 1430, and the performance is much improved.  

I have a ReadyNAS Duo drive which for my wired connections has been working fine, but the wireless ones were so bad.

Once again, thanks a lot, you are a life saver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sir are a complete genius!  Having been banging my head against the wall for the last week or so since trying to setup iTunes on my sons new laptop with Windows 7 64-bit and also transferring my other sons iTunes library to his Vista laptop.</p>
<p>Performance was PAINFULLY bad, and no matter what I tried, it didn&#8217;t work. </p>
<p>I used your MTU setting of 1430, and the performance is much improved.  </p>
<p>I have a ReadyNAS Duo drive which for my wired connections has been working fine, but the wireless ones were so bad.</p>
<p>Once again, thanks a lot, you are a life saver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unofficial ReadyNAS Getting Started Guide by dbott</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>dbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346#comment-279</guid>
		<description>@Bryan:

1.  It can lead to problems.  Not sure why (I don&#039;t work for Netgear), but it does seem to create issues for folks when they create objects (users, groups, shares, hostnames, etc.) with the same name.
2.  Linux-based devices (and OSX, for that matter) have always honoured case-sensitivity when naming files and I doubt that the Linux-community-at-large would allow any change to remove case-sensitivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bryan:</p>
<p>1.  It can lead to problems.  Not sure why (I don&#8217;t work for Netgear), but it does seem to create issues for folks when they create objects (users, groups, shares, hostnames, etc.) with the same name.<br />
2.  Linux-based devices (and OSX, for that matter) have always honoured case-sensitivity when naming files and I doubt that the Linux-community-at-large would allow any change to remove case-sensitivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wireless Performance Issues with Vista/Windows7 and the ReadyNAS by dbott</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226&#038;cpage=1#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>dbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226#comment-278</guid>
		<description>@Greg:

This work-around is strictly for wireless issues in Vista/Win7 and does not require modifying the MTU on the NAS (you can leave it at 1500 or with JF on).  

If having issues with wired gigE, then you may want to change the MTU on the NAS to 1492 to see if it helps.  Obviously, if other machines are working well with JF on, then they would suffer a performance hit on writing to the NAS, although it may be your only recourse to make Vista perform adequately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Greg:</p>
<p>This work-around is strictly for wireless issues in Vista/Win7 and does not require modifying the MTU on the NAS (you can leave it at 1500 or with JF on).  </p>
<p>If having issues with wired gigE, then you may want to change the MTU on the NAS to 1492 to see if it helps.  Obviously, if other machines are working well with JF on, then they would suffer a performance hit on writing to the NAS, although it may be your only recourse to make Vista perform adequately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unofficial ReadyNAS Getting Started Guide by dbott</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>dbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Yes... it&#039;s not really a recommended method of syncing data, as it may wipe the disk upon insertion.  The best method is to use USB to backup or some sort of rsync backup job to keep the remote unit up-to-date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; it&#8217;s not really a recommended method of syncing data, as it may wipe the disk upon insertion.  The best method is to use USB to backup or some sort of rsync backup job to keep the remote unit up-to-date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unofficial ReadyNAS Getting Started Guide by Graeme</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Any particular &quot;gotchas&quot; by removing a drive from a ReadyNAS duo and putting it into a remote duo? Will the remote nas accept the drive or will it destroy or alter the data on it. Example, you have several gigs of files you want to show to a friend who also has a readynas duo so you pull your backup drive (disk 2) and remove his drive(s) completely and place your drive in his nas. Will it boot? Will it accept the data on the imported drive or cause a major hassle?
Thanks, Graeme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any particular &#8220;gotchas&#8221; by removing a drive from a ReadyNAS duo and putting it into a remote duo? Will the remote nas accept the drive or will it destroy or alter the data on it. Example, you have several gigs of files you want to show to a friend who also has a readynas duo so you pull your backup drive (disk 2) and remove his drive(s) completely and place your drive in his nas. Will it boot? Will it accept the data on the imported drive or cause a major hassle?<br />
Thanks, Graeme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wireless Performance Issues with Vista/Windows7 and the ReadyNAS by Greg Tarsa</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226&#038;cpage=1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Tarsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=226#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I just upgraded one of my machines to Vista and my GbE (Netgear GS108) network performance is unusably slow on the machine.  Most all roads are leading to this page, but I want to know if I change the MTU on the ReadyNAS does it negate the Jumbo Frame performance for my other systems?

I do not want to degrade performance for my entire network just because Vista doesn&#039;t play well with others.

Any insight would be appreciated.

-Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded one of my machines to Vista and my GbE (Netgear GS108) network performance is unusably slow on the machine.  Most all roads are leading to this page, but I want to know if I change the MTU on the ReadyNAS does it negate the Jumbo Frame performance for my other systems?</p>
<p>I do not want to degrade performance for my entire network just because Vista doesn&#8217;t play well with others.</p>
<p>Any insight would be appreciated.</p>
<p>-Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unofficial ReadyNAS Getting Started Guide by Bryan</title>
		<link>http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346&#038;cpage=1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://home.bott.ca/webserver/?p=346#comment-271</guid>
		<description>1.  Is there a problem with share names being the same as group names?   ie; Management group and a \\netshare\management\xxx  

2.  Since this is basically a linux machine.  I have noticed there can be issues with capitalization sometimes.  Where Linux cares and Windows doesn&#039;t.  Accessing directories that were created with uppercase can sometimes cause issues.  Wish they would fix that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Is there a problem with share names being the same as group names?   ie; Management group and a \\netshare\management\xxx  </p>
<p>2.  Since this is basically a linux machine.  I have noticed there can be issues with capitalization sometimes.  Where Linux cares and Windows doesn&#8217;t.  Accessing directories that were created with uppercase can sometimes cause issues.  Wish they would fix that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
